loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 1024
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.1.0-rc6-next-20221125-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.2/11465 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880767828f8 (&sbi->alloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_block_free+0xdd/0x500 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:182

but task is already holding lock:
ffff8880200d5208 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_file_truncate+0x205/0x10d0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:576

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x12f/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
       hfsplus_get_block+0x27b/0x9b0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:260
       block_read_full_folio+0x35b/0x9d0 fs/buffer.c:2271
       filemap_read_folio+0xdb/0x2c0 mm/filemap.c:2425
       do_read_cache_folio+0x1df/0x510 mm/filemap.c:3552
       do_read_cache_page mm/filemap.c:3594 [inline]
       read_cache_page+0x5d/0x160 mm/filemap.c:3603
       read_mapping_page include/linux/pagemap.h:755 [inline]
       hfsplus_block_allocate+0x143/0x8c0 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:37
       hfsplus_file_extend+0x43a/0xf60 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:468
       hfsplus_get_block+0x1b3/0x9b0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:245
       __block_write_begin_int+0x3bd/0x14b0 fs/buffer.c:1991
       __block_write_begin fs/buffer.c:2041 [inline]
       block_write_begin+0xb9/0x450 fs/buffer.c:2102
       cont_write_begin+0x534/0x740 fs/buffer.c:2456
       hfsplus_write_begin+0x87/0x150 fs/hfsplus/inode.c:52
       generic_perform_write+0x256/0x570 mm/filemap.c:3771
       __generic_file_write_iter+0x2ae/0x4d0 mm/filemap.c:3899
       generic_file_write_iter+0xe3/0x350 mm/filemap.c:3931
       call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2174 [inline]
       new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline]
       vfs_write+0xa45/0xe40 fs/read_write.c:584
       ksys_write+0x12b/0x250 fs/read_write.c:637
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (&sbi->alloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x2a43/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x630 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5633
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x12f/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
       hfsplus_block_free+0xdd/0x500 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:182
       hfsplus_free_extents+0x1ff/0x4f0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:363
       hfsplus_file_truncate+0xe36/0x10d0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:591
       hfsplus_setattr+0x1f2/0x320 fs/hfsplus/inode.c:269
       notify_change+0xca7/0x1420 fs/attr.c:482
       do_truncate+0x143/0x200 fs/open.c:65
       handle_truncate fs/namei.c:3216 [inline]
       do_open fs/namei.c:3561 [inline]
       path_openat+0x2157/0x2a50 fs/namei.c:3714
       do_filp_open+0x1ba/0x410 fs/namei.c:3741
       do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x4c0 fs/open.c:1310
       do_sys_open fs/open.c:1326 [inline]
       __do_sys_creat fs/open.c:1402 [inline]
       __se_sys_creat fs/open.c:1396 [inline]
       __x64_sys_creat+0xcd/0x120 fs/open.c:1396
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock);
                               lock(&sbi->alloc_mutex);
                               lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock);
  lock(&sbi->alloc_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

3 locks held by syz-executor.2/11465:
 #0: ffff888075242460 (sb_writers#17){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: do_open fs/namei.c:3550 [inline]
 #0: ffff888075242460 (sb_writers#17){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: path_openat+0x19b3/0x2a50 fs/namei.c:3714
 #1: ffff8880200d5400 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#25){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:756 [inline]
 #1: ffff8880200d5400 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#25){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: do_truncate+0x131/0x200 fs/open.c:63
 #2: ffff8880200d5208 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_file_truncate+0x205/0x10d0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:576

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 11465 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc6-next-20221125-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0xd1/0x138 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2177
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x2a43/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x630 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5633
 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
 __mutex_lock+0x12f/0x1360 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
 hfsplus_block_free+0xdd/0x500 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:182
 hfsplus_free_extents+0x1ff/0x4f0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:363
 hfsplus_file_truncate+0xe36/0x10d0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:591
 hfsplus_setattr+0x1f2/0x320 fs/hfsplus/inode.c:269
 notify_change+0xca7/0x1420 fs/attr.c:482
 do_truncate+0x143/0x200 fs/open.c:65
 handle_truncate fs/namei.c:3216 [inline]
 do_open fs/namei.c:3561 [inline]
 path_openat+0x2157/0x2a50 fs/namei.c:3714
 do_filp_open+0x1ba/0x410 fs/namei.c:3741
 do_sys_openat2+0x16d/0x4c0 fs/open.c:1310
 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1326 [inline]
 __do_sys_creat fs/open.c:1402 [inline]
 __se_sys_creat fs/open.c:1396 [inline]
 __x64_sys_creat+0xcd/0x120 fs/open.c:1396
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f318368c0d9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 f1 19 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f318436b168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000055
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f31837abf80 RCX: 00007f318368c0d9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000020000140
RBP: 00007f31836e7ae9 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007fff88e7b2bf R14: 00007f318436b300 R15: 0000000000022000
 </TASK>