hrtimer: interrupt took 23059 ns
======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
4.9.155+ #27 Not tainted
-------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor730/2080 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff810b1d2d>] __do_page_fault+0x7bd/0xa60 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1342
but task is already holding lock:
 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814131ca>] inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:768 [inline]
 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814131ca>] generic_file_write_iter+0x9a/0x630 mm/filemap.c:2903
which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

       lock_acquire+0x133/0x3d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3756
       down_write+0x41/0xa0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:52
       inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:768 [inline]
       shmem_fallocate+0x143/0xab0 mm/shmem.c:2681
       ashmem_shrink_scan drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c:462 [inline]
       ashmem_shrink_scan+0x1c3/0x4c0 drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c:446
       ashmem_ioctl+0x29b/0xdd0 drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c:804
       vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:43 [inline]
       file_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:493 [inline]
       do_vfs_ioctl+0xb87/0x11d0 fs/ioctl.c:677
       SYSC_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:694 [inline]
       SyS_ioctl+0x8f/0xc0 fs/ioctl.c:685
       do_syscall_64+0x1ad/0x570 arch/x86/entry/common.c:285
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x5d/0xdb

       lock_acquire+0x133/0x3d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3756
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:521 [inline]
       mutex_lock_nested+0xc7/0x920 kernel/locking/mutex.c:621
       ashmem_mmap+0x53/0x470 drivers/staging/android/ashmem.c:378
       mmap_region+0x7e7/0xfa0 mm/mmap.c:1726
       do_mmap+0x539/0xbc0 mm/mmap.c:1505
       do_mmap_pgoff include/linux/mm.h:2032 [inline]
       vm_mmap_pgoff+0x179/0x1c0 mm/util.c:329
       SYSC_mmap_pgoff mm/mmap.c:1555 [inline]
       SyS_mmap_pgoff+0xfa/0x1b0 mm/mmap.c:1513
       SYSC_mmap arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:96 [inline]
       SyS_mmap+0x16/0x20 arch/x86/kernel/sys_x86_64.c:87
       do_syscall_64+0x1ad/0x570 arch/x86/entry/common.c:285
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x5d/0xdb

       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1828 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1938 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2265 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x2d10/0x4350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3345
       lock_acquire+0x133/0x3d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3756
       down_read+0x44/0xb0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:22
       __do_page_fault+0x7bd/0xa60 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1342
       do_page_fault+0x28/0x30 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1469
       page_fault+0x25/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:951
       generic_perform_write+0x1b6/0x500 mm/filemap.c:2743
       __generic_file_write_iter+0x340/0x530 mm/filemap.c:2878
       generic_file_write_iter+0x38a/0x630 mm/filemap.c:2906
       new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:498 [inline]
       __vfs_write+0x3c1/0x560 fs/read_write.c:511
       vfs_write+0x185/0x520 fs/read_write.c:559
       SYSC_write fs/read_write.c:606 [inline]
       SyS_write+0xdc/0x1c0 fs/read_write.c:598
       do_syscall_64+0x1ad/0x570 arch/x86/entry/common.c:285
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x5d/0xdb

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10);
                               lock(ashmem_mutex);
                               lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10);
  lock(&mm->mmap_sem);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

2 locks held by syz-executor730/2080:
 #0:  (sb_writers#6){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8150cf79>] file_start_write include/linux/fs.h:2642 [inline]
 #0:  (sb_writers#6){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8150cf79>] vfs_write+0x3e9/0x520 fs/read_write.c:558
 #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814131ca>] inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:768 [inline]
 #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#10){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff814131ca>] generic_file_write_iter+0x9a/0x630 mm/filemap.c:2903

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 2080 Comm: syz-executor730 Not tainted 4.9.155+ #27
 ffff8801ce60f5d8 ffffffff81b47871 ffffffff83cab180 ffffffff83cb47b0
 ffffffff83cc95d0 ffffffff8424cd40 ffff8801cf3197c0 ffff8801ce60f630
 ffffffff813ff29c ffff8801ce60f760 ffffffff84027500 ffff8801cf31a0c0
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff81b47871>] __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:15 [inline]
 [<ffffffff81b47871>] dump_stack+0xc1/0x120 lib/dump_stack.c:51
 [<ffffffff813ff29c>] print_circular_bug.cold+0x2f6/0x454 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1202
 [<ffffffff8120a390>] check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1828 [inline]
 [<ffffffff8120a390>] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1938 [inline]
 [<ffffffff8120a390>] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2265 [inline]
 [<ffffffff8120a390>] __lock_acquire+0x2d10/0x4350 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3345
 [<ffffffff8120c493>] lock_acquire+0x133/0x3d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3756
 [<ffffffff82810894>] down_read+0x44/0xb0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:22
 [<ffffffff810b1d2d>] __do_page_fault+0x7bd/0xa60 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1342
 [<ffffffff810b2028>] do_page_fault+0x28/0x30 arch/x86/mm/fault.c:1469
 [<ffffffff82817ab5>] page_fault+0x25/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:951
 [<ffffffff8140ff16>] generic_perform_write+0x1b6/0x500 mm/filemap.c:2743
 [<ffffffff81412f40>] __generic_file_write_iter+0x340/0x530 mm/filemap.c:2878
 [<ffffffff814134ba>] generic_file_write_iter+0x38a/0x630 mm/filemap.c:2906
 [<ffffffff8150a431>] new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:498 [inline]
 [<ffffffff8150a431>] __vfs_write+0x3c1/0x560 fs/read_write.c:511
 [<ffffffff8150cd15>] vfs_write+0x185/0x520 fs/read_write.c:559
 [<ffffffff81510aec>] SYSC_write fs/read_write.c:606 [inline]
 [<ffffffff81510aec>] SyS_write+0xdc/0x1c0 fs/read_write.c:598
 [<ffffffff810056bd>] do_syscall_64+0x1ad/0x570 arch/x86/entry/common.c:285
 [<ffffffff82816a93>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_swapgs+0x5d/0xdb