loop4: detected capacity change from 0 to 64 ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected syzkaller #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz.4.5063/26516 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88807f0e00b0 (&tree->tree_lock#2/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfs_find_init+0x18e/0x2c0 fs/hfs/bfind.c:-1 but task is already holding lock: ffff888051a50df8 (&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfs_extend_file+0xda/0x14c0 fs/hfs/extent.c:397 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}: lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:598 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x187/0x1350 kernel/locking/mutex.c:760 hfs_extend_file+0xda/0x14c0 fs/hfs/extent.c:397 hfs_bmap_reserve+0x107/0x430 fs/hfs/btree.c:269 __hfs_ext_write_extent+0x1fa/0x470 fs/hfs/extent.c:121 __hfs_ext_cache_extent+0x6b/0x9b0 fs/hfs/extent.c:174 hfs_file_truncate+0x476/0xad0 fs/hfs/extent.c:527 hfs_file_release+0xc5/0x100 fs/hfs/inode.c:596 __fput+0x44c/0xa70 fs/file_table.c:468 task_work_run+0x1d4/0x260 kernel/task_work.c:227 resume_user_mode_work include/linux/resume_user_mode.h:50 [inline] exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xe9/0x130 kernel/entry/common.c:43 exit_to_user_mode_prepare include/linux/irq-entry-common.h:225 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work include/linux/entry-common.h:175 [inline] syscall_exit_to_user_mode include/linux/entry-common.h:210 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x2bd/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f -> #0 (&tree->tree_lock#2/1){+.+.}-{4:4}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline] validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 __lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237 lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:598 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x187/0x1350 kernel/locking/mutex.c:760 hfs_find_init+0x18e/0x2c0 fs/hfs/bfind.c:-1 hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:200 [inline] hfs_extend_file+0x2f6/0x14c0 fs/hfs/extent.c:401 hfs_bmap_reserve+0x107/0x430 fs/hfs/btree.c:269 hfs_cat_create+0x1c5/0x730 fs/hfs/catalog.c:104 hfs_create+0x66/0xe0 fs/hfs/dir.c:202 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3796 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3895 [inline] path_openat+0x14f4/0x3830 fs/namei.c:4131 do_filp_open+0x1fa/0x410 fs/namei.c:4161 do_sys_openat2+0x121/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1437 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1452 [inline] __do_sys_creat fs/open.c:1530 [inline] __se_sys_creat fs/open.c:1524 [inline] __x64_sys_creat+0x8f/0xc0 fs/open.c:1524 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock); lock(&tree->tree_lock#2/1); lock(&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock); lock(&tree->tree_lock#2/1); *** DEADLOCK *** 4 locks held by syz.4.5063/26516: #0: ffff88807f0e2420 (sb_writers#38){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x41/0x90 fs/namespace.c:508 #1: ffff888051a529a0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#27){++++}-{4:4}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:980 [inline] #1: ffff888051a529a0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#27){++++}-{4:4}, at: open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3892 [inline] #1: ffff888051a529a0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#27){++++}-{4:4}, at: path_openat+0x8da/0x3830 fs/namei.c:4131 #2: ffff88807f6640b0 (&tree->tree_lock#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfs_find_init+0x18e/0x2c0 fs/hfs/bfind.c:-1 #3: ffff888051a50df8 (&HFS_I(tree->inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: hfs_extend_file+0xda/0x14c0 fs/hfs/extent.c:397 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 26516 Comm: syz.4.5063 Not tainted syzkaller #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/25/2025 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x189/0x250 lib/dump_stack.c:120 print_circular_bug+0x2ee/0x310 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2043 check_noncircular+0x134/0x160 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3165 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3284 [inline] validate_chain+0xb9b/0x2140 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3908 __lock_acquire+0xab9/0xd20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5237 lock_acquire+0x120/0x360 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5868 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:598 [inline] __mutex_lock+0x187/0x1350 kernel/locking/mutex.c:760 hfs_find_init+0x18e/0x2c0 fs/hfs/bfind.c:-1 hfs_ext_read_extent fs/hfs/extent.c:200 [inline] hfs_extend_file+0x2f6/0x14c0 fs/hfs/extent.c:401 hfs_bmap_reserve+0x107/0x430 fs/hfs/btree.c:269 hfs_cat_create+0x1c5/0x730 fs/hfs/catalog.c:104 hfs_create+0x66/0xe0 fs/hfs/dir.c:202 lookup_open fs/namei.c:3796 [inline] open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3895 [inline] path_openat+0x14f4/0x3830 fs/namei.c:4131 do_filp_open+0x1fa/0x410 fs/namei.c:4161 do_sys_openat2+0x121/0x1c0 fs/open.c:1437 do_sys_open fs/open.c:1452 [inline] __do_sys_creat fs/open.c:1530 [inline] __se_sys_creat fs/open.c:1524 [inline] __x64_sys_creat+0x8f/0xc0 fs/open.c:1524 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xfa/0xfa0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f33c1f8f6c9 Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 a8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48 RSP: 002b:00007f33c2dbc038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000055 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f33c21e5fa0 RCX: 00007f33c1f8f6c9 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000200000000000 RBP: 00007f33c2011f91 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 00007f33c21e6038 R14: 00007f33c21e5fa0 R15: 00007fffe3a37068 hfs: request for non-existent node 327680 in B*Tree hfs: request for non-existent node 327680 in B*Tree