======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.15.139-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.2/7860 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88801bfff8f8 (&sbi->alloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_block_allocate+0x8a/0x8d0 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:35

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88807c14d8c8 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_file_extend+0x1d2/0x1b10 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:457

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       lock_acquire+0x1db/0x4f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5622
       __mutex_lock_common+0x1da/0x25a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:596
       __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 [inline]
       mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:743
       hfsplus_get_block+0x37f/0x14e0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:260
       block_read_full_page+0x2f9/0xde0 fs/buffer.c:2290
       do_read_cache_page+0x752/0x1040
       read_mapping_page include/linux/pagemap.h:515 [inline]
       hfsplus_block_allocate+0xfa/0x8d0 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:37
       hfsplus_file_extend+0xa4c/0x1b10 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:468
       hfsplus_get_block+0x402/0x14e0 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:245
       __block_write_begin_int+0x60b/0x1650 fs/buffer.c:2012
       __block_write_begin fs/buffer.c:2062 [inline]
       block_write_begin fs/buffer.c:2122 [inline]
       cont_write_begin+0x5d6/0x840 fs/buffer.c:2471
       hfsplus_write_begin+0x92/0xd0 fs/hfsplus/inode.c:53
       generic_perform_write+0x2bf/0x5b0 mm/filemap.c:3776
       __generic_file_write_iter+0x243/0x4f0 mm/filemap.c:3903
       generic_file_write_iter+0xa7/0x1b0 mm/filemap.c:3935
       call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:2103 [inline]
       new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:507 [inline]
       vfs_write+0xacf/0xe50 fs/read_write.c:594
       ksys_write+0x1a2/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:647
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb

-> #0 (&sbi->alloc_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x1646/0x58b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3787
       __lock_acquire+0x1295/0x1ff0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5011
       lock_acquire+0x1db/0x4f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5622
       __mutex_lock_common+0x1da/0x25a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:596
       __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 [inline]
       mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:743
       hfsplus_block_allocate+0x8a/0x8d0 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:35
       hfsplus_file_extend+0xa4c/0x1b10 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:468
       hfsplus_bmap_reserve+0x101/0x4e0 fs/hfsplus/btree.c:357
       hfsplus_rename_cat+0x1cf/0x1090 fs/hfsplus/catalog.c:456
       hfsplus_unlink+0x304/0x7f0 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:376
       hfsplus_rename+0xc4/0x1b0 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:547
       vfs_rename+0xbfc/0xf90 fs/namei.c:4742
       do_renameat2+0xb97/0x13b0 fs/namei.c:4892
       __do_sys_rename fs/namei.c:4938 [inline]
       __se_sys_rename fs/namei.c:4936 [inline]
       __x64_sys_rename+0x82/0x90 fs/namei.c:4936
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb

other info that might help us debug this:

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock);
                               lock(&sbi->alloc_mutex);
                               lock(&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock);
  lock(&sbi->alloc_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

7 locks held by syz-executor.2/7860:
 #0: ffff888077e80460 (sb_writers#28){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write+0x3b/0x80 fs/namespace.c:377
 #1: ffff88807c14cd40 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#17/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:822 [inline]
 #1: ffff88807c14cd40 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#17/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_rename+0xf6/0x1c0 fs/namei.c:2967
 #2: ffff888089af1740 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#35){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock_nested include/linux/fs.h:822 [inline]
 #2: ffff888089af1740 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#35){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: lock_two_inodes+0xfc/0x180 fs/inode.c:1063
 #3: ffff888089af75c0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#35/4){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vfs_rename+0x749/0xf90 fs/namei.c:4714
 #4: ffff88801bfff998 (&sbi->vh_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_unlink+0x15d/0x7f0 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:370
 #5: ffff8880795680b0 (&tree->tree_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_find_init+0x146/0x1c0
 #6: ffff88807c14d8c8 (&HFSPLUS_I(inode)->extents_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: hfsplus_file_extend+0x1d2/0x1b10 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:457

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 7860 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 5.15.139-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/10/2023
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x1e3/0x2cb lib/dump_stack.c:106
 check_noncircular+0x2f8/0x3b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2133
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3053 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3172 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x1646/0x58b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3787
 __lock_acquire+0x1295/0x1ff0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5011
 lock_acquire+0x1db/0x4f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5622
 __mutex_lock_common+0x1da/0x25a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:596
 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 [inline]
 mutex_lock_nested+0x17/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:743
 hfsplus_block_allocate+0x8a/0x8d0 fs/hfsplus/bitmap.c:35
 hfsplus_file_extend+0xa4c/0x1b10 fs/hfsplus/extents.c:468
 hfsplus_bmap_reserve+0x101/0x4e0 fs/hfsplus/btree.c:357
 hfsplus_rename_cat+0x1cf/0x1090 fs/hfsplus/catalog.c:456
 hfsplus_unlink+0x304/0x7f0 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:376
 hfsplus_rename+0xc4/0x1b0 fs/hfsplus/dir.c:547
 vfs_rename+0xbfc/0xf90 fs/namei.c:4742
 do_renameat2+0xb97/0x13b0 fs/namei.c:4892
 __do_sys_rename fs/namei.c:4938 [inline]
 __se_sys_rename fs/namei.c:4936 [inline]
 __x64_sys_rename+0x82/0x90 fs/namei.c:4936
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x3d/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb
RIP: 0033:0x7fee631e7ae9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fee617480c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000052
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fee63307050 RCX: 00007fee631e7ae9
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000020000300 RDI: 0000000020000b00
RBP: 00007fee6323347a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000006e R14: 00007fee63307050 R15: 00007ffd7a72fa38
 </TASK>